Haryana RERA Rejects Tata Primanti Buyers’ Claims After Conveyance Deed


✦ AI Summary

Gurugram: The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has dismissed a complaint filed by buyers of a villa in Tata Primanti, Gurugram, after they executed the property's conveyance deed without recording any objection or reserving their claims against the developer.

The dispute relates to villa VA-8 in the Sector 72 project. The buyers, Chanchal Batra and Neeraj Batra, had sought compensation and refunds from Tata Housing Development Company over alleged delay, pending amenities, maintenance and electricity charges, and structural defects.

The conveyance deed was executed on September 8, 2022, after the buyers had taken possession of the villa. No protest or reservation of claims was recorded when the deed was signed. HRERA also found no allegation that the buyers had been forced to execute the document.

What the Buyers Had Claimed

The complaint concerned a villa measuring around 3,887 sq ft.

The buyers sought delay-possession compensation and reimbursement of maintenance and electricity charges. They also claimed ₹22.2 lakh for pending amenities and facilities and raised concerns about alleged structural defects in the villa.

The claims were brought after possession had been taken and the conveyance deed had been executed.

The absence of any protest or reservation when the deed was signed was one of the issues considered by HRERA while deciding the complaint.

The order does not establish that signing a conveyance deed automatically ends every claim a homebuyer may have. The decision relates to the facts and documents placed before HRERA in this case.

For buyers dealing with the final transfer of a property, understanding what a conveyance deed is and why it is important can help clarify the role of the document in transferring ownership.

Occupation Certificate Was Issued Before the Allotment

HRERA also examined the project's occupation certificate while considering the buyers' claim for delay compensation.

Tata Primanti received its occupation certificate on June 23, 2017. The villa was allotted to the complainants in October 2021, several years after the certificate had been issued.

HRERA rejected the delay compensation claim after considering this timeline.

The occupation certificate was already in place before the villa was allotted to the buyers.

The project's registration records are also available with Haryana RERA. Tata Housing Development Company is listed as the promoter for Primanti Phase 2 in Gurugram.

Why the Conveyance Deed Mattered

A conveyance deed formally transfers ownership of a property to the buyer.

In this case, the buyers had already taken possession when they executed the deed. They did not record an objection or reserve the claims that they later raised before HRERA.

That formed part of the authority's reasoning while deciding the complaint.

The outcome should not be treated as a rule covering every dispute that arises after a conveyance deed is signed. The agreement between the parties, the nature of the complaint and the circumstances of each transaction can affect the outcome.

For buyers, it is worth checking for unresolved issues before signing final property documents. If an amenity remains incomplete, money is disputed or another contractual issue is pending, the buyer should keep the matter properly documented.

A Fact-Specific HRERA Order

RERA disputes involving possession and conveyance deeds can have different outcomes depending on the facts.

In the Tata Primanti case, the occupation certificate had been issued in 2017, the villa was allotted in 2021 and the conveyance deed was executed in 2022 after possession.

The buyers had not recorded a reservation of their claims when the deed was signed.

HRERA ultimately dismissed the complaint against Tata Housing Development Company and Tata Primanti Residents Welfare Association.

A separate recent Haryana RERA case involving delayed possession in Gurugram resulted in the authority directing a developer to pay 11% annual interest to buyers. The facts and outcome were different, but the case also dealt with the importance of contractual possession timelines.

The case puts attention on the documents exchanged and signed during the final stages of a property transaction. Those records can become important if a dispute is later taken before RERA.

Key Details

Detail Information
Project Tata Primanti
Location Sector 72, Gurugram
Villa VA-8
Area Around 3,887 sq ft
Buyers Chanchal Batra and Neeraj Batra
Developer Tata Housing Development Company
Conveyance deed September 8, 2022
Occupation certificate June 23, 2017
Villa allotment October 2021
Main claims Delay compensation, refunds, amenities and alleged defects
Outcome HRERA dismissed the complaint

The HRERA order was uploaded on September 29, 2026. The matter was registered as CR/2780/2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ans 1. Haryana RERA dismissed the complaint after considering that the buyers had taken possession and executed the conveyance deed without recording any protest or reserving their claims. The authority also considered the project’s occupation certificate and allotment timeline.

Ans 2. The buyers sought delay-possession compensation, reimbursement of maintenance and electricity charges, ₹22.2 lakh for pending amenities and facilities, and raised concerns about alleged structural defects.

Ans 3. The conveyance deed for the disputed villa was executed on September 8, 2022. The buyers had already taken possession of the property.

Ans 4. Not necessarily. The outcome can depend on the facts, the wording of the documents and the nature of the claim. Haryana RERA orders have considered statutory rights separately from other financial claims, so a conveyance deed should not be treated as a blanket waiver in every case.

Ans 5. The occupation certificate was issued on June 23, 2017, while the disputed villa was allotted to the buyers in October 2021.

Ans 6. Buyers should review pending payments, amenities, possession-related issues, defects and other unresolved claims before signing. If an issue remains disputed, the buyer should consider documenting the objection or reservation clearly before executing the final property documents.